An Open Letter to Stephen King

RE: Under the Dome

Dear Mr. King

Courtesy Google Images

I just finished reading Under the Dome and all I can say is, ‘WOW!’ You weren’t kidding when you wrote in the author’s note that you “… tried to write a book that would keep the pedal consistently to the metal.” This book has a lot of pages, but the chapters are short and captivating. Once I began reading, it was hard to put down.

I became interested in the novel after watching the 2013 thirteen-episode summer miniseries of the same name on CBS. I wondered how the show tracked against the novel.

I almost didn’t watch the show because I figured it was going to be a grittier version of Gilligan’s Island under glass. Also, I pondered which came first, Fox’ 2007 The Simpsons Movie in which the fictional town of Springfield is domed in by the U.S. government or your book.

Simpsons Courtesy Google Images

It is … the movie. However, as you explain on STEPHENKING.COM, the genesis of Under the Dome came circa 1978. You said you were thinking about dome and isolation long before the Simpsons were conceived.

Dome, isolation, carnage, destruction, and death are more like it. The only similarity between the two concepts is a dome of some sort encasing a fictional town.

Chester's Mill Courtesy Google Images

In your book, I lost count of how many denizens of Chester’s Mill, Maine met their demise (people and animals) in the first fifty pages or so. Holy half-a-cow! I learned to avoid character attachments because chances were they wouldn’t be around for a prolonged period of time.

One of the main characters is second selectman Big Jim Rennie (portrayed by Dean Norris in the CBS series). What a prick! The book does a terrific job of detailing how a power-crazed douchebag can take a town’s complete isolation and use it to create a world in which he is king and emperor. His character reminded me of Napoleon, the pig from George Orwell’s Animal Farm. Both characters eventually reveal themselves to be self-indulgent, maniacal control-freaks.

The TV miniseries, which will continue in the summer of 2014 (and I read on TV. com that you’ll be writing the first episode) is quite different then the book. The CBS show seems to be loosely based on the novel. The series has Chester’s Mill and Big Jim is still a prick, but the timeline of events has been altered slightly. It’s definitely less graphic, and characters and events that are not in the novel have been introduced.

I suppose this is to make it more TV-friendly? In any event, I like the show even though it doesn’t follow the book exactly. I am curious to see if the producers of the CBS show resolve the crisis in a manner similar to your book.

Mr. King, Under the Dome is the first novel of yours that I have read. In 1979, when I left MassMutual to join the military, my co-workers gave me a copy of The Stand. Unfortunately, somewhere between Springfield, Massachusetts and Parris Island, South Carolina I lost the book and never acquired another copy.

If the rest of your material is as engaging as Under the Dome, I’ve certainly been missing out. In any event, I’ve determined I’m going to acquire a Stephen King book or two to find out.

Good Baby?

Nature versus nurture— it’s an age old argument. Is a person’s personality determined by heredity or is it shaped by the environment? Are babies born good or is behavior learned?

On Sunday, November 18, 2012 CBS’ 60 Minutes aired a segment detailing a study that leads researchers to believe children as young as six months old know the difference between good and bad.

Lead by Paul Bloom and Karen Wynn, husband and wife psychologists at Yale University, the study explores a variety of tests created to determine if children could identify a “good” puppet versus a “bad” puppet. The test subjects were babies, six-months of age, of both sexes and varying races.

Out of the multitude of tests, two piqued my curiosity.

1. A puppet attempted to open the lid of a box. A second puppet (good), offered assistance. A third puppet (bad) prevented the first puppet from opening the box. Next, a different researcher, one who didn’t know which puppets had been presented as good or bad, held the good and bad puppets at arm’s length in front of a baby. A majority of the children reached for the good puppet.

Courtesy CBS 60 Minutes

2. A puppet played with a ball. A second puppet came into play and “stole” the ball away. In most cases, the baby would pick the puppet that didn’t “steal” the ball.

The research results seem to indicate that people are born with an innate sense of what is good behavior and what is bad. As a parent, I find this fascinating because I wonder why some aspects of my kids’ personalities are so varied, yet others are similar. Did we raise them that differently or were they just wired that way from birth?

I suppose there are a number of factors that determine a person’s personality. But, I’d like to think we’re all born with our moral compass intact; that we possess a basic sense of right and wrong.

What do you think has the greatest impact – heredity or environment?

The Lost Script

I’m a fan of Star Trek, especially the original series, which aired from 1966 to 1969 on NBC.

Forty plus years ago, when I was in seventh or eighth grade, I read a book about the origins of the original Star Trek series. Sadly, I do not recall the name of the text nor do I remember the author’s moniker. I do remember it was a paperback with a dark cover. Some of the book’s details have stayed with me.

Here are a few things of interest that I recall:

· The US Navy was intrigued by the layout of the Enterprise’s bridge and its potential use aboard US warships.
· During filming of the show at Desilu Studios, the use of the bathroom was prohibited because the sound of the toilet flushing got picked up by microphones.
· Gene Roddenberry presented the Star Trek concept to CBS prior to NBC. Supposedly, after completing his pitch, CBS told him no thank you because they were planning a space show of their own, Lost in Space. Reportedly, Roddenberry became upset when CBS used some of his Star Trek ideas in Lost in Space.

Interestingly, CBS Studios, Inc owns the rights to the Star Trek franchise.

I found out that a new version of the 1960s series persists. Original episodes of Star Trek featuring Kirk, Spock, et al are available at phase2trek.com (Star Trek Phase II). The crew of the U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701 is played by amateur actors. Everything Star Trek is protected by copyright but CBS Studios, Inc allows the Star Trek Phase II site to exist because there is no profit derived from the material presented on the site.

Star Trek Phase II has some pedigree. Episodes have been written by the likes of Dorothy Fontana, a television writer since 1960 and former story editor for Star Trek. Some episodes have even featured appearances from original cast members.

But, CBS strikes. According to Thomas Vinciguerra of The New York Times, CBS squashed the use of a previously unused Star Trek script, “He Walked Among Us”, written by Norman Spinrad. Spinrad had donated his copy of the script to California State University, Fullerton.

The folks at Star Trek Phase II learned of the script and planned to run with it. CBS invoked their proprietary rights and squashed production of the script. J. Alec West of Star Trek Phase II wrote that, “Since Star Trek is a CBS/Paramount property, Phase II has agreed not to shoot it.”

Maybe CBS has plans for the script. Could it be used as the basis for a new Star Trek movie? I can only hope.
Does anyone want to see “He Walked Among Us” on the big screen?